DISCLAIMER:
I do not agree with Ann Barnhardt declaring that Jorge Bergoglio is an antipope. I do not agree with her because it is not possible for any of us to make such a declaration or to know it. Only a future Pope or Council can declare it to be so, if it even is so. While we may have suspicions about Benedict XVI leaving the papacy all we know is what we can know, that he says he was not forced out and that the election process was validly conducted. Further, the priests of the Diocese of Rome accept Jorge Bergoglio as their bishop and the Catholic faithful acknowledge him as Pope. Since 2 + 2 = 4 and not 5, notwithstanding the Bergoglio minion, Spadaro; Bergoglio is therefore, Pope.
Further, I think Ann should not have said and written what she has publicly, even if privately, she came to that conclusion.
There.
Now, a few months ago, I can't find the link, Monday Vatican reported on the potential of a Third Vatican Council. It went no further, no blog picked up on it, nor did I wish to push it.
Now, Ann has.
http://www.barnhardt.biz/2017/01/28/answers-why-wont-any-cardinals-speak-up-against-bergoglio/
So let me connect some dots. Maybe it's because I'm clean having just come back from Confession an hour ago ...
This is Fatima coming to life right before us.
I do not agree with Ann Barnhardt declaring that Jorge Bergoglio is an antipope. I do not agree with her because it is not possible for any of us to make such a declaration or to know it. Only a future Pope or Council can declare it to be so, if it even is so. While we may have suspicions about Benedict XVI leaving the papacy all we know is what we can know, that he says he was not forced out and that the election process was validly conducted. Further, the priests of the Diocese of Rome accept Jorge Bergoglio as their bishop and the Catholic faithful acknowledge him as Pope. Since 2 + 2 = 4 and not 5, notwithstanding the Bergoglio minion, Spadaro; Bergoglio is therefore, Pope.
Further, I think Ann should not have said and written what she has publicly, even if privately, she came to that conclusion.
There.
Now, a few months ago, I can't find the link, Monday Vatican reported on the potential of a Third Vatican Council. It went no further, no blog picked up on it, nor did I wish to push it.
Now, Ann has.
http://www.barnhardt.biz/2017/01/28/answers-why-wont-any-cardinals-speak-up-against-bergoglio/
So let me connect some dots. Maybe it's because I'm clean having just come back from Confession an hour ago ...
This is Fatima coming to life right before us.
- Bergoglio will call a Council, it will be an evil Council because the intent will be to enshrine sacrilege, change doctrine, unite with protestantism and create ecumenical worship.
- God, in His vengeance, will not tolerate it and will, in His permissive will, permit a massive terrorist attack to take place by Mohammedans.
- St. Peter's Basilica, where most of the bishops and cardinals (not all, some will not attend because they know it will be a corrupt council) will be destroyed and most there will be killed, including the Pope Francis.
- Then, a "Bishop in white" will emerge and crawl over their dead bodies and up to the high altar where he will then be killed. That "Bishop in white" (note the Fatima seers did not say the Pope, even though they presumed him to be), is Joseph Ratzinger
- The few surviving Cardinals will flea to Portugal, to Fatima where the "dogma of faith" will be preserved.
- They will elect the Holy Pope who will then, with the remaining bishops and cardinals of the world, Consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.
- Russia will come to the literal physical aid of Europe, the Orthodox Church will reunite with eternal Rome under Peter and this Holy Pope will "restore all things in Christ."
- And a period of peace will be granted to the world, until we mess it up again.
- And then the end will come.
God help us.